POTEMKIN VILLAGE POLICING

 

IN A POTEMKIN VILLAGE POLITY

IN A POTEMKIN VILLAGE “JURISDICTION”

The small island of Jersey is a kind of liminal quasi-jurisdiction – not part of the UK – but under British control – in a “legal” and fiscal marriage-of-convenience; a curious status-quo immensely beneficial to the British establishment at its very highest levels.

But the incapacities and corruptions of the island’s polity – the overt rot, and frank danger posed to the public by Jersey’s public administration – is no longer disguisable, and has its most high-profile manifestation in decades of concealed child-abuse.

To this very day, every part of Jersey’s public authorities – the Crown functions in particular, of policing, prosecution and judiciary – are wholly conflicted, corrupted, and pro-actively involved in concealing the concealments of those decades of the abuse of children.

But, you know, in many ways the current disastrous condition of public authority in Jersey isn’t so surprising; the island’s polity isn’t – and hasn’t ever really been – a lawful system.

It’s a Potemkin village – a sham – a fake. Mere painted cardboard, put up to disguise the toxic lawless reality behind.

It is that way – has been enabled to be that way – and is protected in being that way – by the powers in London.

The collection of low-grade spivs, pervert Freemasons, tax-dodge-grifters, shysters in blazers and overt functional psychopaths who’ve been given licence to run the island would be swept away – in certain cases suspended, arrested, in jail on remand awaiting trial – all within 24 hours – if that was the mind of the real powers in London.

In the main legal application to be brought against the Crown, Secretary of State for Justice and Privy Council, I write this: –

“The Jersey judicial and prosecution function is a Potemkin Village.

It is as simple as that.

 With grand buildings, and fanfares, and fancy-dress, and ceremonies and stentorian posturing, the prosecution function and the judicial function – which are so overlapped and cross-contaminated in Jersey as to be indivisible in any credible sense – might, at the most fleeting of glances, give the appearance of being a real prosecution function – and a real judicial function.

They are not.

 The “system” is a Potemkin village.

With a Potemkin court.

 The instant you get up close to it – you see it for the painted scenery that it is. The fakery isn’t even well done. You can see the supposedly solid structures, swaying with the breeze. You go up to them – peer around the edges of the sagging cardboard and paste – and see a few silly old men and their stage-hands desperately trying to keep the painted flats propped-up with a few lengths of 2 x 4 and some bits of string – the images running & melting in the dampness – futile in the hard gale and rain of modernity.”

I was reminded of the Potemkin village nature of what passes for a polity in the crown Dependency of Jersey when reading of the latest abusive and illegal campaign of harassment, intimidation, breaches of the Data Protection Law, and attempts to destroy careers and livelihoods engaged in by one of the Jersey oligarchy’s state-sponsored trolls.

Fellow blogger and anti-child-abuse campaigner Rico Sorda has written a series of remarkable postings which detail the many months of abuse he and his wife have suffered, which included threats to her career & health and that of her unborn child.

The postings – which include interviews with Mr Sorda – and a recording of the troll making one of his many obnoxious and threatening telephone calls – can be found here: –

http://ricosorda.blogspot.com/2014/07/jersey-cyber-stalking-part-1-our-story.html

http://ricosorda.blogspot.com/2014/08/jersey-cyber-stalker-part-2-our-story.html

http://ricosorda.blogspot.com/2014/08/jersey-cyber-stalker-part-3-our-story.html

The most remarkable thing about the postings is the detail and chronology of attempts by Rico Sorda – and his wife – to make formal criminal complaints to what passes for a policing function in Jersey – and the absolute refusal of the Jersey Police to take any protective action towards Mr & Mrs Sorda – to even investigate their complaints – to even have the courtesy to respond to e-mails.

That refusal by what passes for a Crown policing function in Jersey to investigate and protect people from crime is all the more remarkable when one considers the fact the troll – as he reveals in the telephone call – has been supplied with the private, personal income tax details of Mr Sorda by someone who has access to the public’s income tax data.

The politicised lawlessness of the Crown policing function in Jersey comes as no surprise to civil society in the island and campaigners who have sought to oppose and expose the decades of illegally concealed child-abuse.

Whilst national and international readers always find these things shocking, it is simply “The Jersey Way” – local, semi-ironic short-hand for the seething, fly-blown dung-heap of baksheesh, venality, freemasonry, sleaze, fraud, corruption, undisguised criminality and endemic racketeering that forms the reality of life in the island beneath the cosmetics of mowed lawns, flags and ornamental cows.

Why – and how – Jersey is like this isn’t difficult to explain. Again, as I write in the main legal application against the Crown, Privy Council & Secretary of State:

“To understand what follows – it needs to be recognised that Jersey is, essentially, a feudal society; an anachronism that has survived for centuries, no matter the thin veneer of modernity. The Channel Islands were the only European territory occupied by Nazis during WWII whose indigenous power-establishments prospered and survived during – and after – those events, untroubled and unchanged. Much of the manifestly surreal dysfunction – the palpable sense of absolute power and reckless invulnerability enjoyed by the local oligarchy today – can be traced back to Crown and United Kingdom failure to hold to account and clean-up the profiteering and corrupted Jersey media, policing, prosecution and judicial functions in the immediate wake of the Occupation. To this very day – the power-structure and apparatus of Jersey is wholly analogous to a feudal “court” – in which political power, patronage, careers and law-enforcement are in the “gift” of the feudal “court”, its Barons, thanes and its “courtiers”. You are “of” the “court”, or one of its vassals – or you are an enemy of the “court” – and will be ruthlessly crushed.”

When we look at Jersey and what it is, what we observe is an actual, feudal society – with all of the inherent lawlessness – hiding in plain sight – in 21st century western Europe.

That is why a public-spirited, independent investigative journalist like Rico Sorda is not provided with the proper protections of objective policing – and his criminal abusers are encouraged and shielded. By deciding that he was going to help oppose and expose decades of concealed child-abuse, Mr. Sorda inadvertently put himself in opposition to Jersey’s feudal “court” and its decades of lawless failure to protect vulnerable children.

I’m in the same position myself, of course – having been foolish enough to think that a Social Services Minister, with express, statutory legal obligations to investigate child protection failures – should investigate child-protection failures.

I wasn’t, of course, the only senior public official with a duty to child-welfare to be oppressed for trying to carry out those duties; the same fate befell the only good Police Chief Jersey has ever had, Graham Power QPM, who made the “mistake” of believing the absolute legal requirement on the Police to enforce the law impartially, should mean just that.

Police Chief Graham Power was illegally suspended – in what will yet prove to have been a terminal act of stupidity and hubris by Jersey’s oligarchy. It seemed the “perfect solution” to them – a “stroke of genius”. The inevitable reckonings of history were bearing down upon them and decades of the routine concealments of serious crimes – not just child-abuse – were in the process of unraveling – and spilling the stinking entrails across the picture-postcard face of the Crown’s favorite tax-haven. Sex-offenders in the Crown Offices, the routine concealments of crimes in and by public sector departments, planning corruption, corporate manslaughter, battery, rape, child-rape and clinical murders; sleaze, corruption and savage, life-wrecking crimes – concealed in any case involving the well-connected, the powerful or the public-sector. The boil was about to be lanced by the first good, impartial Police Chief in Jersey’s history – so he was illegally suspended by the very corrupt apparatus whose malfeasances were being exposed.

That criminal conspiracy – the illegal suspension of Jersey’s Police Chief – remains an uninvestigated criminal enterprise.

The Jersey Police – now back under the customary private-sector control that historically always operated policing in Jersey – have refused to investigate that crime. The refusal to investigate in this case had a black-farce comic element in the desperation of the cops to wash their hands of the problem.

In order to be able to bury the burial of the criminal conspiracy against Police Chief Graham Power, the Jersey Police under the leadership of Mike Bowron – the expressly and deliberately recruited former Police Chief of the City of London Corporation – had to maneuver themselves into a position where they had drawn a kind of fake “line” under the complaint, and could write in their records words to the effect the complaint had been “investigated”, found to be baseless, and the complainant notified. To make that concoction of cobblers appear less incredible, they had to find a way of “disposing of the evidence” or, at least expunging all trace of it from their “official” records. But merely “destroying” the evidence – well, that’s a bit of a no-no, in this day and age. Bowron and his cops alighted upon the “genius solution” – of just simply sending it all back to me.

There then follows yet another farce of Beckettian blackness that has seen the Jersey Police make repeated attempts to make me come and collect the copies of the evidence from the Police Headquarters, and have me take it all away with me. Not being a total halfwit, I saw immediately why they were doing this; if the evidence were not only gone from Police HQ, but had actually been accepted back into the hands of the complainant, that would mean they could falsely rig the records with words to the effect the complainant had “accepted” the “outcome” of the investigation. (The Jersey oligarchy are always on the look-out for “genius”, “perfect solutions” of this kind.)

The evidence in support of the complaints of criminal conspiracy behind the suspension of Graham Power was no longer “evidence” – it was “my property” – and I had to remove it from Police Headquarters.

Here is just some of the correspondence: – 

From:         Percival, Jeremy
To:              Stuart Syvret
Date:          2nd September 2013
Time:          14:15

Dear Mr Syvret,

I understand from our Property Officer that you have not been to collect your documents that were provided to the SOJP last year.

If you could drop into the Enquiry Desk at Police Headquarters and give them the following reference number they can return them to you…

JC/3639/12

Thank you. 

Jeremy”

Here’s my reply: –

“From: Stuart Syvret

To:    Percival, Jeremy

Date:6th September 2013

Time:          12:28

Dear Officer Percival

The documents you refer to are my statement of criminal complaint – and various evidential documents which support that complaint – concerning the illegal suspension of Police Chief Graham Power.

The current Chief Officer – Mike Bowron – has refused to investigate the complaint – and has refused to seek the charging and prosecution of the many evidenced criminals which the evidence and the facts identify.

Instead, the States of Jersey Police under the leadership of Mr Bowron, have sought for themselves an excuse – a “reason” – to ignore the evidenced criminal conspiracy in which the basic rights of many people in Jersey to objective, impartial policing were undermined and abused by a group of powerful, wealthy criminals – including politicians and Crown Officers – who mounted a coup against unbiased policing in Jersey. 

I have been informed that the States of Jersey Police and Mr Bowron “obtained legal advice from Jersey lawyers” – which “advice” – unsurprisingly – falsely claimed that “no criminal offences were apparent”. 

That “advice” is plainly incorrect, false, and a continuance of the cover-ups. 

I formally require to know – who were the legal advisers in question? 

Just to cite one example of the evidence – former Attorney General – now Deputy Bailiff – William Bailhache, made an wholly illegal – criminal – attempt to coerce Police Chief Graham Power into dropping an investigation into planning corruption. This fact is evidenced by no less a witness than the former Police Chief himself, who describes – in his affidavit – William Bailhache ending the communication with the words “so be it!” 

I view the present actions of the States of Jersey Police Force – and of Mr Bowron – in refusing to take proper policing action in this matter, to be a furtherance – and an extension of – the self-same criminal enterprise by which Graham Power was illegally suspended. 

I reject – entirely – the failure and refusal of the States of Jersey Police Force to take these matters forward. 

As far as I – and others – are concerned – this remains a “live” matter – an on-going criminal enterprise – subject to a recorded criminal complaint. 

Therefore, I want and expect the statement of criminal complaint – and the associated evidence – to remain on the record with the States of Jersey Police Force – until such time as the Force is under non-politicised, non-criminally collusive leadership – when the criminal complaints will then be properly investigated. 

I repeat – as far as I and others are concerned – this complaint, and associated issues are not “at an end”; they remain live and out-standing. 

The present conduct of the States of Jersey Police Force and of Mr Bowron will become a component in the litigation against the Privy Council, Crown and Secretary of State for Justice.  

In the mean time, I await the answer to my question concerning the identity of the “legal advisers” the States of Jersey Police Force and Mr Bowron have used in providing them with the “cover” for refusing to take the proper, lawful action, by falsely “advising” that the criminal acts complained of are “not criminal”. 

Thank you for your assistance. 

Stuart Syvret”

Although the refusal of the Jersey Police to investigate those crimes is already deeply serious, one of the more entertaining features of the Police conduct was their refusal to tell me who their “legal” advisers were.

Detective Constable Percival responded to the above e-mail at 11:11 on 10th September 2013, asserting the following:

“I am not at liberty to disclose the name of the Police Legal Advisor.”

This was such an overtly outrageous piece of nonsense, questions were asked in the Jersey parliament of the Home Affairs Minister on the 5th November by Deputy Trevor Pitman. Here is the question – and the wretched concoction of fabrication, omissions and outright lies given in an “answer” by Jersey’s Home Affairs Minister Ian Le Marquand: –

Deputy T. Pitman:-

“Would the Minister inform members whether the Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, in response to allegations made to the Police by former Senator S. Syvret relating to corruption, advised Mr. Syvret that his concerns had been referred to a local legal firm and had been deemed groundless, and, if so, which legal firm was utilised and why?”

Senator I Le Marquand: –

“I am assuming that the matters to which Deputy Trevor Pitman refers relate to a complaint made by Mr. Syvret to the States of Jersey Police in May 2012.  The allegations made by Mr. Syvret were not new and were both complex and numerous, totalling some 60 separate allegations.  Inquiries and independent legal assessment by the Jersey law firm Carey Olsen concluded early this year when Mr. Syvret was advised in March 2013 by the Deputy Chief Officer of Police that there was no new evidence to support his assertions of criminality, the majority of matters having already been subject to earlier consideration, investigation and where appropriate, action.  The independent legal assessment was sought by the police from Carey Olsen because that firm had previously been involved in advising in relation to similar complaints.”

Deputy T. Pitman: –

“I thank the Minister for that and for revealing which firm it was.  Could he just clarify, was the information, the decision as it was, put across to Mr. Syvret in writing or was it verbal?  Does the Minister know if that can be verified in any way?”

Senator Le Marquand:

“There was a letter written by the Deputy Chief Officer of Police and that is what I have quoted in my answer.”

The answers given by the Home Affairs Minister are the customary hotchpotch of fairy-stories, self-hypnoses and glossolalia we’ve come to expect as normal in the Jersey Parliament.

Hey – maybe that’s the way Ministers feel compelled to act, these days – given the last time a States of Jersey Minister said anything honest about the decades of concealed child-abuse – he was removed from Office in an illegal coupe led by the culpable senior civil-servants and Crown Officers – and was then subjected to a Stalinist show-trial for whistle-blowing?

So – that’s how it is – within Jersey, there exists no part of the law-enforcement system – police, prosecution, or judiciary – nor any part of the legislature – that is not contaminated – and not wholly captured, politicised and corrupted – and bound, now, to a doomed conspiracy of self-protection – and on a path that only ever leads, no matter its windings, to one destination.

The evidenced – unlawful – conduct of the States of Jersey Police Force on display against Rico Sorda, and against me – and against every ordinary powerless person in Jersey who should be able to rely on the impartial protections of effective policing – is now another entry on the ledger.

There’s going to be a reckoning.

Stuart Syvret

27 thoughts on “POTEMKIN VILLAGE POLICING

  1. Anonymous

    Excellent post Stuart; one of your best for years. “Functional psychopath” – I had to look that one up but yes, oh so accurate! Please consider standing for election this autumn. Jersey is so desperately in need of the honest, and strong leadership you could once again provide.

    Reply
  2. anon

    I agree with the first commenter you should stand for election stuart. Since the illegal removal of police chief Graham Power the force has become politicized under Mike Bowron who is protecting a government troll and looking the other way while Jeremy Percival helps to protect the same troll. We need a strong leader in the states who will hold this corrupt police force to task and with the loss of Deputy Pitman poor old Deputy Higgins is a lone voice in that vipers nest.

    Reply
  3. Anonymouse

    The rest of the UK isn’t any different when you scratch underneath the surface. The same lot involved in corruption, crimes, Misconduct in Public Office, Malfeasance and more. Those who try to expose these find themselves targeted and then persecuted for their efforts.

    The UK has a unit within the Home Office that is linked to security services, Special Branch and Police which has the task of surveillance, character assassination, smears and generally trying to make life for these people as unpleasant as possible.

    The establishment and their cronies know what goes on but seem powerless to do anything. They are controlled either by threats, or blackmail.

    It is likely this may be extended to cover Jersey if they see anyone as a threat to their vile ways. Does anyone have reason to think it is being conducted on the Channel Islands?

    Reply
  4. Hill Street Blues

    “Mr. Syvret was advised in March 2013 by the Deputy Chief Officer of Police that there was no new evidence to support his assertions of criminality, the majority of matters having already been subject to earlier consideration, investigation and where appropriate, action”

    I thought the quote above was a very useful phrase for obsevers of the Jersey scene to concentrate on. Analysing it, I think we can see revealed the very heart of the problem with the way law is developed and applied locally and – no doubt – in other areas too.

    It also suggests that the powers that be have lost contact with objective reality and far from them consciously oppressing and harassing whistleblowers, they actually believe what they think. The toxic root is in the legal concept of precedent, coupled with excessive respect for the abilities of those legal functionaries who created any such precedent. In other words, when a court or judge has ruled on a new type of case or a new aspect of existing case law, these judgments are treated almost as holy writ – as if somehow the pronoucement of judgement has re-defined objective reality. After such precedent is etablished all the little legal students learn it from their law books and absorb it and treat it as gospel. If they don’t, then they probably won’t ever get to be lawyers, which is a powerful motivator for them to swallow their foolish principles and start believing in the full majesty of the law.

    When people appeal they think they are appealing against the judgement but actually, except in very rare cases, judgements are very rarely overturned because there is a very powerful prejudice that, if legal precedure has been correctly followed, that judgements should stand. Only if smoking gun new evidence is presented that overturns previously used evidence does the appellant have a hope. The prejudice is that the original judge, judgement and legal process is treated almost as infallible for establishing justice.

    Where the phrase I quoted comes in is that it blatantly states that there was no new evidence and asserts that the events complained about had already been investigated and considered – in other words, the evidence had already been looked at and judgement as to whether to investigate further or drop it had already been made. Only new evidence could put a dent in the “infallible” reality defining prior judgement. What this “infallible” legal way of pronouncement overlooks is that if the original evidence was poorly or casually evaluated or inadequately considered due to the pre-existing political bias and filtered prejudice of the evaluators, and so the correct inferences and apprehension of the truth never got made, that the original judgement itself is almost certainly not valid and, naturally, that the judgemental ability of those who made it is also flawed. Legal types rely too much on the “infallibility” and so called reality defining abilities of their profession to be capable of reliably seeing the wood for the trees.

    Reply
    1. Le Marquand's self-delusion

      Great comment HSB.
      An explanation (excuse actually) for those of weak mind and weak morals.

      There is some validity in your explanation of the Pavlovian conditioning of the beneficiaries who have spent years or decades in the Jersey legal industry. But you are being overly generous if you are suggesting that the excuse is in any way valid in this world (or in the next?)

      Self interest has a powerful influence on the brain and it’s judgement and these people have allowed their morals to be compromised and perverted beyond a point that would shame the average toddler.

      Except for the minority of psychopaths they do know deep inside that they are just playing the game and using contorted legal excuse to protect their position and their “investment” and they rationalise to avoid fully facing their consciences in this world.

      Legal precedent and refusal to examine previous legal “opinion” is a convenient shield regularly used here and so regularly by Le Marquand and his ilk. However only the terminally bigoted could fail to notice that “legal precedent” is applied differently. A different set of laws and “precedents” applies to “good chaps”/”club members” as applies to the rest of us and particularly to “troublemakers” whom have poked holes in the charade maintained by the establishment.

      They know that they are just “holding up the scenery”, as Mr. Syvret described but they probably imagine that they are doing so for the “greater good”.

      They are benefiting from a very lucrative industry and therefore continue to play the game (kerching!) and do not wish to be excommunicated from the high-church of Jersey Law by publicly questioning the “faith” or objecting to the regular selling of “indulgences” to the favoured few.

      Significantly some Jersey Lawyers have shown considerable fortitude when squeezed by the workings of the shyster-hijacked “justice industry”:

      http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/advocate-philip-sinel-interview-part-1.html
      &
      http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/advocate-philip-sinel-interview-part-2.html

      The light has been switched on. How long before the cockroaches scatter?

      http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2014/08/15/ex-chelsea-boss-condemns-jersey-justice/

      I bet most comments are not permitted on that JEPedo thread LOL

      Reply
  5. Anonymous

    Yes Stuart please stand for the General Election in October. Just put yourself forward for it. You have nothing to loose. Rattle cages!?

    Reply
  6. Sue Young

    Stuart. There will soon be nobody left to represent the oppressed so please stand for election and help rid the Island of the politicised Bowron and the corrupt Bailhache brothers.

    Reply
  7. Frances

    I came across this today. It illustrates why those in power, both Jersey and the UK, are unwilling to investigate and prosecute those involved in child abuse. They are involved themselves, or others close to them are paedophiles with a history of criminal acts that are abhorrent to most people.

    http://www.scriptonitedaily.com/2013/12/18/uk-establishment-closes-ranks-as-organised-paedophile-network-leads-back-to-no-10/

    We have a ruling class that are drawn from an elite that is sick beyond belief. One thing is for certain, we must get change and decent people to stop this horrendous acts of abuse. Are you up for it Stuart?

    Reply
  8. If you tolerate this, your children will be next

    Following many requests from establishment party friends Murray Norton has announced that he will be standing for election in St.Brelade

    http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2014/08/press-release-from-murray-norton.html

    Murray Norton has just resigned from the BBC where he has spent many years not reporting or investigating information which is damaging to the establishment such as the affidavit of the illegally suspended chief of police. Constructively dismissed to undermine his planning corruption and child abuse investigations.

    Murray is a fair and exemplary Jersey employer, (notwithstanding the loss of the odd employment tribunal case)

    While no rival to the famous Sir Jimmy Savile, Murray is a tireless charity fundraiser even to the extent of taking part in the cyber bullying campaign against a less successful charity fundraiser in the entirely legitimate hope hope that the unfortunate Simon Abbot would put the donated goods into Murray’s far more capable hands.

    We understand that Murray took an active part in this campaign, even to the extent of tricking the ill Mr. Abbot out of hiding so that Murray’s photographer friend Ian Le Sueur could take
    illicit pictures of him:

    http://dearjon-letter.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/did-cyber-bullies-kill-simon-abbott.html

    Such a shame that Murray’s guile and rudimentary investigative talents were not put to better use protecting Jersey’s most vulnerable children from abuse.

    If Murray has ever expressed contrition for his part in this, I have yet to see it.

    Murray was joined in his efforts by some of the usual suspects including the voluptuous and colourful Maureen Morgan (who is a fortune teller and dildo saleswoman …..Hmmm, I think I would sooner go to Anne Summers).

    Unlike the flaky Maureen Morgan, Murray is surely a shoe-in with the dopey electorate of middle-jersey.

    With Murray the establishment’s future will be in safe hands and the gullible and ill-informed will continue to ‘enjoy’ the government the deserve.

    Reply
  9. anon

    You have to stand for election Stuart. If Maureen Morgan stands again that will be two cyber bullies standing (her and Murray Norton) then there is the liar Andrew Lewis standing.
    If ever Jersey needed you it is now.

    Reply
    1. Stuart Syvret

      I can’t stand for election.

      I’m constructively barred from candidature – and those who may wish to have voted for me are constructively barred from exercising their free choice in the legislature – because Queen Elizabeth II has chosen to suppress me – and those who would choose – and have chosen – to vote for me.

      She has chosen to so oppress me – for the “offence” of exposing and shaming the wretched criminal decadence of Her apparatus in Jersey, and the racketeers, rapists and child-abusers which that apparatus nurtures & conceals.

      She is able to exercise this power – because the writ of the Act of Settlement does not run in the Crown Dependencies – so the British Monarch can confer Her power – via Her personal Letters Patent – on evidenced criminals – such as William Bailhache – who then illegally oppress electoral results, such as me.

      The Crown Dependencies are pure – undiluted – feudatories – hiding in plain sight – in 21st century Europe.

      Even if I had any chance electorally against Her apparatus and Her powers – She would just have me illegally oppressed – again – by Her direct agents – such her “Bailiffs” and “Vicomtes”.

      Think about it.

      Why do you just think Jersey just suddenly rushed in a panicked up-date of the “Treason” law – after 800 years?

      Stuart

      Reply
  10. Stuart Syvret

    I’m re-posting the following comment a reader left under an earlier posting: –

    “apropos elections, what the Hell is going on in St Ouen? Rumour is Russell Labey and Mark Forskitt standing against a couple of good old boys. I would love to be at that hustings meeting.”

    I think the reader intended that to be a topical comment.

    If Mark Forskitt & Russell Labey are running against each-other, I’d regard that as disappointing.

    I know both men – and both would make excellent States members.

    Running against each-other means they’ll just split the intelligent vote – thus making it easier for the customary old-school ignorant Jersey oligarchy cosa nostra dopey sock-puppets.

    Stuart

    Reply
  11. Leigh LaFon

    Probably one of your best entries since your post-prison blog banning.

    There is a great deal for UK campaigners to learn from this in advance of the UK national CSA Inquiry. From the start, if the survivors and their allies do not demand some control over the Terms of Reference, the Chairperson, COI Committee-members, and media rules and communications, it will be another whitewash. There is no reason for anyone to trust the same people who covered up abuse before to be any more forthcoming because of an inquiry. Trustworthy oversight and credible independence are simply not there.

    Someone in the UK has begun listing recently failed CSA investigations and inquiries on a blog there. More than 45 such failures were initially listed and many more could be added. Why would Jersey be any different? I see no signs it will be. Very sad.

    Elle

    Reply
    1. Stuart Syvret

      It’s here: –

      “http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/private-eye-and-jerseygate/”

      Stuart

      Reply
  12. The Fourth Estate

    Exaro News

    Tell us in confidence

    Do you have material that you think the Exaro editorial team should investigate?

    If so, please contact us:

    Phone: +44 (0)20 7183 9181
    E-mail: news@exaronews.net

    You can also send material to us by post:

    Editorial
    Exaro
    107 Fleet Street
    London
    EC4A 2AB

    Confidentiality

    We strictly observe the first rule of journalism: never to disclose anything that might help identify a confidential source. So, if you want us to press on with an investigation, please contact us by e-mail, telephone or post.

    Anonymity

    It is easier for us to investigate a story if you let us know who you are, but we understand that sometimes anonymity is essential. With the Exaro secure dropbox, you are able to submit source material securely online for investigation, which also provides the option of anonymity.

    The server for our secure dropbox is located in a specially selected legal jurisdiction where privacy and anonymity are legally protected. It is totally separate from the server for the Exaro website. All information is encrypted in transit, and we keep no server logs of visitors to the dropbox. Beyond these measures, it is left to you to take any necessary, additional steps to prevent your identity becoming known.

    As with any secure site, please check the secure dropbox site’s security certificate in your browser before proceeding.

    Our commitment to evidence-based journalism means that we must authenticate and verify any material or information that we receive.

    It is easier for us to investigate a story if you let us know who you are. We never disclose anything that might help identify a confidential source. However, you can submit material to the dropbox anonymously if necessary.

    Proceed to the dropbox to submit material securely, with the option to remain anonymous. Proceeding to the dropbox will direct you off this site to our secure dropbox server, which will display in a new window.

    Reply
  13. Anon

    Mr. Syvret,

    You state in your blog posting “POTEMKIN VILLAGE POLICING” that there are (plural) “Sex-offenders in the Crown Offices”.

    I must admit, this is somewhat of a disturbing revelation, and the first time I have read that the Crown Offices are corrupted by such persons; how many sex-offenders are you talking about? Are you at liberty to name them?

    Reply
  14. Frances

    Stuart,

    Some thoughts following the latest child abuse cases to be exposed in the UK. Once more, the authorities were fully aware of the type and extent of the abuse that occurred for years in Rotherham, yet allowed this to continue without any action.

    It seems to me that in view of the large numbers of cases that have been exposed over recent years, it is possible to draw certain conclusions about what exists in relation to child abuse in the UK, plus Jersey.

    These case have some common features: the children are from underprivileged backgrounds, living in care homes, care, or under the “care” and “protection” of the authorities of whatever nature. The children were subjected to horrific abuse (and worse) by people who were supposed to be caring for them, “the Great and the Good”, celebrities and others who held official positions in authority. This list is not exhaustive. These people were allowed, encouraged possibly to engage in their sick pursuits by those in power without any attempt to step in to stop this.

    It seems that this is a class issue as the overall situation has been it is permissible for those in power, or attached to power, to abuse children from poor and underprivileged backgrounds. That these children are expendable in the pursuit of sick pleasure by the rich and powerful, plus those with whom they associate.

    The position in Jersey was the same where children were put at the disposal of the so called “care providers”, plus their rich and powerful friends (and more).

    Class war anyone?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.